Archive for the ‘Alex Johnson’ category

I Am Not Seeking Enlightenment

July 28th, 2010

Buddha and catOn a personal note, this post will briefly explain my position and motivations for doing this work with The Unity Project, and why I created it.

On occasion, when speaking with people about The Unity Project, I realize that sometimes they assume that my motivation for studying enlightenment, epiphanies, and awakenings, is so that I can get information or ideas to help ME achieve enlightenment.

It is a natural assumption. However, that is not the case.

There are several reasons that “I am NOT seeking enlightenment”:

1.  I am not really motivated to achieve enlightenment.

I am not unhappy with my life at all, and am not “driven” in any way to change my outlook at this time. I might say, that I am a “truth seeker”, in a way. That is, I am driven to find out about things, and to uncover the true nature of life and the universe.  I love to always learn, and broaden my outlook and understanding of life. So, you might say that I am driven to learn and grow, but not from pain or negativity, only from curiosity and love of life. It may sound funny, but there is no deep motivation for me to fundamentally change the way I am now.
( Some others I know might disagree, but I won’t go into that now!)

2.  To “Seek” enlightenment would block any chance of it happening.

This is what I have heard referred to as “the paradox of spiritual effort”. 
Nitin Trasi, in his book “The Science of Enlightenment” sums this up well;

“Actually it is not very surprising that Enlightenment should occur so rarely.
Enlightenment, as it has already been explained, is the actual perception or realization
(not belief or mere intellectual understanding) that one is not a separate entity. 
Therefore, the very pursuit of this as a goal to be ‘attained’ by a ‘me’ will be counter-productive,
because the very effort will reinforce the conviction in the existence of a ‘me’ as a separte entity.
As this is the exact opposite of the result desired, the aspirant will be moving around in circles.”

The Science of Enlightenment, p. 38.

In many cases, it is when a person “gives up” on “spiritual pursuits”, that they make the most progress. I am not motivated to achieve enlightenment, and if I were, I would realize that to “seek” it would be to destroy my chances of achieving it.

Eckhart Tolle, in a video online titled “Enlightenment”, says this;

“You cannot make – whether you call it the ego-less state, or whether you call it enlightenment – you cannot make it into a goal.  Goal implies future. Because the very entry point into the ego-less state, or the enlightened state, is the present moment. If you make it into a goal, that you want to achieve, you MISS the entry point, because you’re looking to the future, because “goal” implies future. That is the dilemma of all spiritual seekers.”

 3.  I am open to enlightenment, awakenings and epiphanies.

Though I am not actively “seeking” enlightenment, I am fully open to the possibility that it COULD happen to me, at any time.  This is also true for any other awakenings or epiphanies. (In fact, I have smaller level epiphanies quite often.)

This is part of ideas I have developed in The Unity Project, relating to the following items;

  • You would likely never achieve enlightenment, or awakenings, if you actively thought that you were NOT capable of it, or if you thought that it would never happen to you.
  • You must entertain the possibility that enlightenment could happen to you. That is, you must not actively “block” your possibilities by your attitudes.
  • To be open to experiencing awakenings and epiphanies, at any time, is necessary. Even though you are open to the possibility of it happening, you must also be open to it happening AT ANY TIME. Some may believe that they could become enlightened, but that it would happen “out there”, sometime “in the future”, or even in “another lifetime” etc. What I mean here, is to be open to these experiences at any moment.

WHY STUDY ENLIGHTENMENT, EPIPHANIES, AND AWAKENINGS?

Though I am not actively seeking enlightenment myself, I am still extremely interested in these subjects.

Enlightenment, awakenings and epiphanies are extremely interesting to me for the following reasons:

* They involve a “sudden” insight that has the power to transform our lives.
Unlike an automobile accident, or winning the lottery, this sudden transformation comes from within. When I refer to “enlightenment” and “awakenings” or “epiphanies”, what I am generally referring to are experiences that are PROFOUND… potentially life changing.  What interests me is how our consciousness could create a situation where an entirely new perspective is experienced, where our life is profoundly changed in a positive way. HOW does this happen, and WHY?

* There is a “light switch” character to these transformations.
There most often seems to be a strong distinction between the moment BEFORE an awakening or epiphany, and the moment AFTER. In addition, once this threshold is crossed, there is no going back. This is fascinating to me. How does a permanent change in our makeup take place? What happens in the brain, and in our mental makeup, to have a shift like this possible?

* This is the cutting edge of consciousness studies.
Enlightenment, awakenings, and epiphanies are unique phenomena. They are dealing with the highest levels of brain functioning and mind, and their relative rarity makes them even more important to study. I have found a fairly wide crossover of these topics with other studies involving ESP, Near Death Experiences, and the mystery of sleep. So these phenomenon can point to areas of understanding that may have applications in other aspects of consciousness studies.

* There might be a way to facilitate the occurrence of these experiences.
Aside from Buddhism, there doesn’t seem to be much practical advice one can take to learn how to have, or to facilitate these experiences. I know that, as far as enlightenment is concerned, there are some who will say; “Just practice Buddhism, this will lead to enlightenment”. While I agree that practicing Buddhism has that potential, I think that it is, what I have termed, “The Long Hard Road” method of doing it. I believe there may be OTHER ways of achieving enlightenment today that are more conducive to our modern way of life and thinking. It seems that a new, fresh look at this whole topic is in order.

* Studying these experiences will likely lead to unexpected surprises.
Focusing in on awakenings, epiphanies, and enlightenment will likely lead to breakthroughs in our understanding of consciousness, and perhaps even lead to practical applications that can actually make a difference in people’s lives. What IF there were methods available that could facilitate profound awakenings or epiphanies? We don’t know what we will find in these studies, but I believe that, due to the profound and complex nature of these phenomena, that we will find something very important – something that could potentially change the lives of many people in a positive direction.

* Awakenings and epiphanies are linked to creativity.
I think that it is likely that the findings of these studies will improve the odds of people being able to make huge leaps in creativity. Most profound insights lead to renewed energy and excitement, and are often followed up by healthy and joyful activity. Renewed creativity and quantum leaps in insight could have exponentially large positive outcomes. For example, if that creativity were to result in things like new answers to energy problems, environmental issues, and  other major life factors for the future of our planet and our species.

All of these points are inherently fascinating to me.

I would study them even if there were no chance at all that I would personally reap the benefits in practical terms. Just the sheer enjoyment of studying and learning about these experiences and how they are possible is motivating enough for me.

In fact, I HAVE thought about the dilemma of actually achieving enlightenment, or a profound awakening in my life. I have wondered how that might change my study of these issues.

It seems, at first, that it would be a very strong advantage to actually experience these things first hand before writing about them. But I am not so sure about that.

I think what I would prefer is to study as much about these topics as I can for some good period of time… and THEN experience a profound awakening.

That way, I could put the “icing on the cake” and tell what could not be told before, about the actual experience.  In addition, if these studies lead to methods that could facilitate an awakening, I would need to be able to experience THAT process in order to know it from the inside out.

Another way of putting it, is that sometimes I think I need to “think like an unenlightened person”, in order to develop what will work for everyone who IS unenlightened. I am fairly sure that there will be many people who disagree with me on this point, thinking even that it is a logical inconsistency.

But let me just say, that since I am in no big hurry to experience enlightenment or an awakening, I can use this time to delve as deeply into it as I can… from the perspective of an ordinary, “unenlightened” individual.

I better get back to work on this project… if I become enlightened too soon it could ruin the whole thing!

I might just turn into one of those people who say; “you can’t talk about it”, “it is something that words just can’t describe”, “you can never get there by thinking about it”, etc.  – I might just turn away with a blissful look on my face and say; “this study is ended”.

In Unity,
AJ

  • Share/Bookmark

The Unity Project Welcomes Terren Suydam

July 21st, 2010

In my initial “overview of The Unity Project” I stated the following;

The initial efforts of the project will be to gather information about epiphanies, enlightenment, awakenings, and other “life changing” experiences of a profound nature. More particularly, these experiences should be such that they have a significantly positive influence on the person as a result.

-

The Unity Project will act as a clearing house, or gathering point, for this information. We will review information about these experiences with the purpose of finding commonalities and similar characteristics which might point to methods of creating or reproducing those experiences.

This process began with my own contributions and ideas.

I am happy to announce that The Unity Project has a new “contributor”.

Terren Suydam has been participating in this forum so far by providing cogent and well thought out views via comments on this blog, as well as private emails to me personally.

Since his input has been considered, well-balanced, and clearly stated I have asked him if he would like to contribute to the project.

He has agreed.

Terren will make available a series of articles relating to “epiphanies” very soon. I am looking forward to reading what he has to say.

At this point, a “Contributor” is someone who is willing to contribute their own theories and points of view related to the focus of our investigation, i.e. enlightenment, epiphanies, and awakenings.

If you would like to contribute to this project, please contact me and we can discuss this. Or, you can start by contributing your comments to our blog on a regular basis.

Please welcome Terren Suydam to The Unity Project!

In Unity,
AJ

  • Share/Bookmark

What Is Enlightenment?

July 17th, 2010

One of my first posts in this blog dealt with the problem of defining enlightenment. (See “A Little Background – Definitions“).

The more I study this subject, the more definitions I find.

After thinking for some time about exactly “what is enlightenment”, I have come up with MY OWN definition of enlightenment. 

Following my definition of enlightenment I will present some other definitions that I have come across recently, so that you can compare.

This is my current definition of enlightenment, subject to change without notice…

ENLIGHTENMENT: A state of consciousness that experiences reality unfiltered through any
mental, physical, or psychological distortions.

In my view, enlightenment is an ability to experience the world WITHOUT any personal perceptual filters.

By perceptual filters I mean the following (among others):

  • the false idea of a “self”
  • beliefs
  • expectations
  • desires
  • values
  • languages

In other words, enlightenment is a DIRECT EXPERIENCE OF REALITY.

Before I break down my definition of enlightenment into its separate parts, I would like to address the question of “What is REALITY?”

======================
*  WHAT IS ”REALITY”?
======================

Rainbow BuddhaWhen I refer to enlightenment as “the direct experience of reality”, I can imagine that some readers may have questions or objections about what I may mean by ”reality”.

It is not my purpose to define “reality” here, but I will list some of the objections that may arise in this context:

  1. You cannot define reality.  It is not definable.
  2. There is no such thing as “one” reality – reality is a subjective experience, different for each consciousness.
  3. There is no ”one” reality - reality exists on many levels.

These are all valid points.

When you look up “REALITY” in the dictionary you will find definitions like this:

Reality: “The state of being actual or real; A real entity, event or other fact; The entirety of all that is real; An individual observer’s own subjective perception of that which is real”
http://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/reality

In other words, most definitions say that reality is the state of being real… which really doesn’t tell you much. There are various definitions, but many of them go around in circles without really defining it.

And in a larger sense, to verify something as “real” may seem simple, but can actually be far more problematic than might first be evident. How to verify “reality” is beyond the scope of this post, but is a very interesting topic in itself.

So, in some sense the first objection, that one cannot define reality, is valid.

As to the second objection, that reality is a subjective experience - this can also be true.

Our own EXPERIENCE of reality is subjective, and each person’s is somewhat different. This is AN aspect of reality, but the subjective aspect is only one aspect of reality. Because most of us experience reality subjectively, does not mean that it cannot be experienced objectively. 

And finally, the third objection, that reality exists on many levels, may also be true. There is the macro level, the micro level, the quantum level, the cosmic level, the material level, the seen, the unseen, and on ad infinitum.

When I use the word reality in this definition of enlightenment, what I mean is this:
REALITY IS ALL OF THAT.

Reality is indefinable, it is subjective, and it is multi-level. My definition of reality means that it is EVERYTHING THAT IS, including the contradictory and problematic states of indefinability, subjectivity, and multiplicity.

Enlightenment signifies the ability to see through the “subjective” aspect of our experience of reality, as much as is humanly possible.

My definition proposes that enlightenment is a “state of consciousness”, that “experiences reality” UNFILTERED “through any mental, physical, or psychological distortions”.

===========================
*  UNDERLYING ASSUMPTIONS
===========================

There are several underlying assumptions here.

  1. There is a “reality” that can be fully experienced by a state of consciousness.
  2. That reality is normally “filtered” before it is experienced by our consciousness.
  3. Those filters are mental, physical, and psychological.
  4. Those filters “distort” reality, in such a manner as to change our consciousness of it.
  5. It is possible to experience reality in an unfiltered, undistorted manner through human consciousness.

The “filters” that distort reality for most of us consist of mental, physical, and psychological filters.

I hope to write about this more in the future, but here I will give a very brief overview of these distorting filters.

========================
*  ABOUT THESE “FILTERS”
========================

BuddhaIn putting forth these ideas about how these “filters” alter our perception of reality, I am not overly concerned with the quantification of these points.

That is, it doesn’t really matter exactly what filters what, or how it filters it, at this point.

What I am driving at is that our perception of reality IS FILTERED.

If you, or anyone you know, can present me with a better, more exact or verifiable model of filters and how they work, I would welcome your input and feedback. In the future all of these filters of reality could be looked at in detail, parsed, categorized, and refined.

My main point here, at this time, is that these filters exist, and that it is possible to see reality with a minimum of interference from them – in a state we call enlightenment.

+ +  MENTAL FILTERS -

Your brain is flooded with information every second. Much of that information is filtered out of your conscious awareness from moment to moment.

A mental filter is, in broad terms, a filter that acts primarily through the subconscious, or pre-conscious mind.

Here is an example - If I ask you what your right foot feels like you can tell me. However, before I asked, you probably weren’t consciously aware of the feelings coming from your foot.  That feeling and consciousness of your foot has been filtered out of your primary experience, by what I am calling a “mental filter”.

Another example of how this works might be in driving. Have you ever noticed someone else driving the same model of car as the one that you are driving? Your mental filter normally filters out most of the other cars around you. But when you see a car similar to, or the same as your make and model, your awareness picks it out of all of the other cars and calls your attention to it. This happens automatically, and unconsciously.

Our mental filters significantly change what we see and what we notice about our selves and our surroundings.

For more information, here is an article titled How Thought Creates Reality“, that touches on some of these ideas.

+ +  PHYSICAL FILTERS -

When using the term “physical filters” I am speaking primarily about any physical impairment, or alteration, that changes our perception of reality.

Some examples of physical filters may be:

  • Drugs or other chemical stimulants
  • Alcohol
  • Prescription drugs that alter perceptions
  • Other physical impairments

I am not a doctor or a scientist, so I cannot scientifically prove these points at this time.

However, it seems very likely that there ARE physical filters that could PREVENT the conditions of enlightenment.

It is an interesting question. Exactly which physical changes or impairments would prevent enlightenment, and which would not?

For example, it seems to me that one could be blind or deaf, and experience enlightenment. On the other hand, if certain parts of the brain were impaired or removed that would likely preclude the possibility of enlightenment.

In Buddhism, use of drugs or stimulants is strongly discouraged.

I believe that the brain (and body) should be as free as is possible from all unnatural conditions, in order to be prepared for enlightenment.

It is hard to imagine one becoming enlightened while on a cocaine high, or drunk on alcohol.

If you have any information about ”physical filters”, or impairments, that would impact or prevent the occurrence of enlightenment, I invite you to contact me so that we might present accurate and credible information on this website.

+ +  PSYCHOLOGICAL FILTERS -

Here is an entry in Wikipedia about  “Reality Tunnel“.  This entry points to the type of “psychological filters” I am talking about; 

Every kind of ignorance in the world all results from not realizing that our perceptions are gambles. We believe what we see and then we believe our interpretation of it, we don’t even know we are making an interpretation most of the time. We think this is reality.
– Robert Anton Wilson

“The idea does not necessarily imply that there is no objective truth; rather that our access to it is mediated through our senses, experience, conditioning, prior beliefs, and other non-objective factors. The individual world each person occupies is said to be their reality tunnel. The term can also apply to groups of people united by beliefs: we can speak of the fundamentalist Christian reality tunnel or the scientific materialist reality tunnel.”

“A parallel can be seen in the psychological concept of confirmation bias—our tendency to notice and assign significance to observations that confirm our beliefs, while filtering out or rationalizing away observations that do not fit with our prior beliefs and expectations. This helps to explain why reality tunnels are usually transparent to their inhabitants. While it seems most people take their beliefs to correspond to the ‘one true objective reality’, Robert Anton Wilson emphasizes that each person’s reality tunnel is their own artistic creation, whether they realize it or not.”
(End quote.)

There are MANY psychological filters.

Our environment, our upbringing, our natural tendencies, our past experiences - all of these contribute to psychological factors that filter our experience of “reality”.

For the sake of understanding and insight, these psychological factors could be identified, categorized, and prioritized in more detail in the future.

For now, I would suggest that our “picture” of reality is flawed by a whole collection of factors, most of them going almost entirely unnoticed by the average person.

To peel these filters away can lead to enlightenment -
to experience reality WITHOUT them, IS enlightenment.

============================= buddha enlightenment
* ENLIGHTENMENT AS “TRUTH”
=============================

When I asked a Buddhist monk from Sri Lanka whether it was possible for someone entirely ignorant of Buddhist principles and ideas to become enlightened, he immediately, and unequivocally said; YES.

When I asked him why, he said; “BECAUSE IT IS THE TRUTH”.

This is one of the ideas that lead me to my definition of enlightenment.

I thought: “If enlightenment is TRUTH, then it is REALITY”.

Truth: ” Ideal or fundamental reality apart from and transcending perceived experience:
the basic truths of life.”

http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/truth

It seems to me that enlightenment is seeing “truth”, which is seeing “reality”.

The difference between enlightened experience of reality, and our “normal” experience of reality, is that enlightenment is a state of consciousness that experiences reality without our normal subjective, unconsciously created filters and distortions.

When we see reality “as it is”, we see the “truth”.

When we can see the truth, in this manner, we are said to be “enlightened”.

+++

===============================================================
DEFINITIONS OF ENLIGHTENMENT / DESCRIPTIONS OF ENLIGHTENMENT
===============================================================

David Smith, in his book “A Record of Awakening”, says this; 
“We Buddhists have decided, when reality is fully seen and known, to call that enlightenment or awakening.” (p. 122)
—————————-
Nitin Trasi defines enlightenment in this way;
“Enlightenment is defined as the intuitive understanding that one is not a separate entity.”
(p.5 The Science of Enlightenment.)

In his chapter on “Enlightenment” (p. 53) he defines enlightenment in this way;
“Enlightenment can be defined as the clear and deep intuitive perception (‘apperception’) or intuitive understanding (not just belief or intellectual comprehension) of the entire situation, that is, of the unity of Consciousness and of the  absence of the ‘me’ or ‘I’ as a separate, autonomous entity.”

Mr. Trasi also lists these synonyms at the top of the chapter: Realization; self-realization; awakening; satori; jnana; gyana.
—————————-
Jill Bolte Taylor, in her book “My Stroke of Insight”, quotes Dr. Kat Domingo  as saying;
“Enlightenment is not a process of learning, it is a process of unlearning.”
  (p. 169)
—————————-
“It is, according to Buddha, the end of suffering. Physical pain is still experienced but it is no longer compounded by worries and fears, by mental suffering, which has ended. Enlightenment is the ability to see things as they really are, to accept that what is is, and to say ‘yes’ to all of life. This is done, not out of naivete or denial, but out of a profound realization of the selfless, interconnected, interdependent unity and oneness of all mental and physical phenomena, of all experience.”
http://www.scribd.com/doc/11680701/What-is-Enlightenment
—————————-
“In Buddhism, enlightenment (Bodhi in Sanskrit) refers to a unique experience which wholly transforms the individual from their previous state in samsara.”
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Enlightenment_(Buddhism)

“(Samsara is the cycle of birth, death and rebirth (i.e. reincarnation) within Hinduism, Buddhism, Bön, Jainism, Sikhism, Vaishnavism and other Indian religions. Colloquially, “Samsara” can also refer to a general state of overt or subtle sufferings that occur in day to day life.)”
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Samsara
—————————-
“Enlightenment is essentially realizing the non-dual nature of reality, and for those who understand Hindu philosophy, non-duality is Creation (Param Brahman).”
http://www.buzzle.com/articles/what-is-enlightenment.html
—————————-
The Shambhala Dictionary defines enlightenment as -

“Enlightenment -  The word used to translate the Sanskrit term bodhi (lit., “awakened”) and the Japanese satori or kensho. A person awakens to a nowness of emptiness, which he or she is – even as the en­tire universe is emptiness – and which alone en­ables him or her to comprehend the true nature of things. Since enlightenment is repeatedly mis­understood as an experience of light and experi­ences of light wrongly understood as enlighten­ment, the term awakening is preferable, since it more accurately conveys the experience.”
http://www.shambhala.com/html/learn/features/buddhism/glossary/glossary-E-H.cfm#e-link
—————————-
“If you look at the Hindu and Buddhist tales of enlightenment you’ll find that they aren’t quite sure what it is. Many words are used to describe it, all of the sounding equally exalted in English. Liberation, perfection, freedom, the ‘cessation of the illusion of self”, “crossing over to the other shore”, “truth – consciousness – bliss” (satchitananda), “the supreme awakening”, “great orgasm” (mahamudra).” – Kevin Murphy
http://www.shaktitechnology.com/enlightenment.htm
—————————-
Enlightenment: “A blessed state in which the individual transcends desire and suffering and attains Nirvana.”
(The American Heritage® Dictionary of the English Language)
—————————-
Enlightenment:  ”The awakening to ultimate truth by which man is freed from the endless cycle of personal reincarnations
to which all men are otherwise subject.”
(Collins English Dictionary)
—————————-
Enlightenment:  ”The beatitude that transcends the cycle of reincarnation; characterized by the extinction of desire and suffering
and individual consciousness.”
http://www.thefreedictionary.com/enlightenment
—————————-
“Enlightenment, Buddhism : a final blessed state marked by the absence of desire or suffering”
http://www.merriam-webster.com/netdict/enlightenment
—————————-
“Enlightenment can refer to many different concepts. In a secular or non-Buddhist context, the word enlightenment often means “full comprehension of a situation”.  Spiritual enlightenment means to obtain a spiritual revelation or deep insight into the meaning and purpose of all things, to communicate with or understand the mind of God, to achieve some other type of profound spiritual understanding, or to achieve a fundamentally changed level of existence whereby one’s self is experienced as a nonchanging field of pure consciousness.  Some scientists believe that during meditative states leading up to the subjective experience of enlightenment there are actual physical changes in the brain.”
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Enlightenment_(spiritual)

—————————-
“Enlightenment is awakening to the experience of the world as a unity.” – Terren Suydam
—————————-

ENLIGHTENMENT: 
A state of consciousness that experiences reality
unfiltered through any
mental, physical, or psychological distortions.
The Unity Project

If you care to have YOUR definition of enlightenment added to this list, send it in to me!

Either use the form below, or go to the contact page by clicking here.

In Unity,
AJ

  • Share/Bookmark